Physica

00 Foundations

Pair-production Z² scaling

Pair (and triplet) production rises as Z² above 1.022 MeV.

Listen

Listen · English

Simulation

Pair-production Z² scaling — Change the numbers; the scene follows.

Where it works

Linear accelerator

Linear accelerator

Isocenter

At isocenter, on the central axis through the patient (or a phantom in the same place).

Open this machine

Formula

κZ2(E1.022),E>1.022MeV\kappa \propto Z^2(E-1.022),\quad E>1.022\,\mathrm{MeV}

Variables

Results

  • κ₂/κ₁

    Pair ratio

    418.7896

  • E₁−1.022

    Above threshold

    4.978MeV

  • E₂−1.022

    Above threshold

    16.978MeV

Explanation

κZ2(E1.022),E>1.022MeV\kappa \propto Z^2(E-1.022),\quad E>1.022\,\mathrm{MeV}

What it means

A photon of E > 1.022 MeV can materialise as e⁺e⁻ in the Coulomb field of a nucleus. The cross section per atom goes as Z² and, well above threshold, roughly linearly with E. In bone and in high-Z shields at 18 MV this is no longer negligible; in kV imaging it is identically zero. This is a working relation in Radiation physics.

Where it is used

Clinically it sits on the Linear accelerator — Isocenter. At isocenter, on the central axis through the patient (or a phantom in the same place). Radiation physics lives at the x-ray target, the linac head, and inside the patient: how a photon is born, how it scatters, and how it dies. Use these relations before you trust a spectrum, a wall, or a kV-versus-MV contrast argument.

Linear accelerator · Open this machine

How to use it

Enter Z and E (MeV) for two cases. The ratio uses max(E−1.022, 0) so energies below threshold correctly give zero. Compare 6 MV (mean ~2 MeV) in water vs lead. Change one input and watch the curve and the simulation follow.

Symbols

  • Z₁Reference Z7.4
  • E₁Reference energy6 MeV
  • Z₂New Z82
  • E₂New energy18 MeV

Worked example

A typical case from the default values: Z₁ = 7.4 (Reference Z); E₁ = 6 MeV (Reference energy); Z₂ = 82 (New Z); E₂ = 18 MeV (New energy). Substituting into the relation gives κ₂/κ₁ = 418.7896; E₁−1.022 = 4.978 MeV; E₂−1.022 = 16.978 MeV. These are teaching numbers — align them with your machine.

Typical values give

  • κ₂/κ₁ = 418.7896
  • E₁−1.022 = 4.978MeV
  • E₂−1.022 = 16.978MeV

Where it comes from

The displayed formula is the working relation. Pair (and triplet) production rises as Z² above 1.022 MeV. Usual reference: Heitler / Attix. Derive it in the specialty lesson, then return here to pin the numbers.

Reference: Heitler / Attix

Assumptions & limits

Threshold kinematics only; screening, triplet production (κ ∝ Z) and the slow logarithmic rise of the high-energy cross section are omitted. For quantitative shielding use NIST XCOM or attenuation tables.

Pitfalls

Do not mix free-electron Compton kinematics with photoelectric-dominated kV imaging. Check keV versus MeV, and never treat a spectrum as one photon. Threshold kinematics only; screening, triplet production (κ ∝ Z) and the slow logarithmic rise of the high-energy cross section are omitted. For quantitative shielding use NIST XCOM or attenuation tables.

Keep this

Photons do not deposit dose; the electrons they set in motion do. Threshold kinematics only; screening, triplet production (κ ∝ Z) and the slow logarithmic rise of the high-energy cross section are omitted. For quantitative shielding use NIST XCOM or attenuation tables.

In this specialty

Radiation physics