02 Imaging
Entrance skin dose
Estimate ESD from tube output, kVp, mAs, and FSD.
Listen
Listen · English
Simulation
Entrance skin dose — Change the numbers; the scene follows.
Where it works
Radiography room

Patient
At the patient entrance — skin dose, subject contrast, photoelectric absorption in tissue.
Open this machineFormula
Variables
Results
ESD
Entrance skin dose
1,300µGy
ESD
Entrance skin dose
1.3mGy
Curve
Explanation
What it means
Entrance skin dose estimates the air kerma (with backscatter) at the patient’s skin from tube output Y, kVp, mAs and focus-to-skin distance. It is the quantity compared with deterministic skin thresholds in fluoroscopy. This is a working relation in Diagnostic imaging.
Where it is used
Clinically it sits on the Radiography room — Patient. At the patient entrance — skin dose, subject contrast, photoelectric absorption in tissue. Diagnostic equations live on the tube, the detector, and the patient: magnification, air kerma, CTDI, and why bone lights up at 70 kV. They turn a technique chart into physics you can defend.
Radiography room · Open this machineHow to use it
Y is µGy/mAs at 80 kV and 100 cm. n ≈ 2 for air kerma. BSF is ~1.3 at diagnostic energies. Prolonged fluoro: keep ESD in mind versus ~2 Gy temporary erythema. Change one input and watch the curve and the simulation follow.
Symbols
- YTube output50 µGy/mAs
- kVpTube voltage80 kV
- nkVp exponent2
- mAsmAs20 mAs
- FSDFocus-to-skin distance100 cm
- BSFBackscatter factor1.3
Worked example
A typical case from the default values: Y = 50 µGy/mAs (Tube output); kVp = 80 kV (Tube voltage); n = 2 (kVp exponent); mAs = 20 mAs (mAs); FSD = 100 cm (Focus-to-skin distance); BSF = 1.3 (Backscatter factor). Substituting into the relation gives ESD = 1,300 µGy; ESD = 1.3 mGy. These are teaching numbers — align them with your machine.
Typical values give
- ESD = 1,300µGy
- ESD = 1.3mGy
Where it comes from
The displayed formula is the working relation. Estimate ESD from tube output, kVp, mAs, and FSD. Usual reference: IAEA / Bushberg. Derive it in the specialty lesson, then return here to pin the numbers.
Reference: IAEA / Bushberg
Assumptions & limits
Empirical output model, not a Monte Carlo organ dose. Table attenuation, extra filtration (Cu), and inverse-square inside a C-arm geometry may differ from the simple (100/FSD)² term.
Pitfalls
kVp is not the same as effective energy. CTDI is not patient dose — SSDE and organ dose come after. Do not quote DLP as if it were effective dose without a k-factor. Empirical output model, not a Monte Carlo organ dose. Table attenuation, extra filtration (Cu), and inverse-square inside a C-arm geometry may differ from the simple (100/FSD)² term.
Keep this
Y is tube output at 80 kVp, 1 mAs, 100 cm. Exponent n ≈ 2.
In this specialty