01 Therapy
Output factors Sc, Sp, Sc,p
Total output Sc,p = Sc(collimator) × Sp(phantom). Measured relative to 10×10.
Listen
Listen · English
Simulation
Output factors Sc, Sp, Sc,p — Change the numbers; the scene follows.
Where it works
Linear accelerator

Collimator / MLC
At the jaws / MLC: field size on the collimator sets equivalent square, penumbra, and Sc,p.
Open this machineFormula
Variables
Results
S_{c,p}
Total output factor
1.0302
S_p=OF/S_c
Sp if OF given as Sc,p
1.01
Explanation
What it means
Collimator scatter Sc (or Sc, head scatter) is measured in air with a miniphantom and depends on the jaws / MLC opening. Phantom scatter Sp depends on the irradiated phantom area at the level of the detector. Their product Sc,p is the in-phantom output factor used in every MU calculation. Blocking a field with MLC changes Sp more than Sc. This is a working relation in Radiotherapy.
Where it is used
Clinically it sits on the Linear accelerator — Collimator / MLC. At the jaws / MLC: field size on the collimator sets equivalent square, penumbra, and Sc,p. Radiotherapy equations sit at the console and in the bunker: output, depth dose, equivalent square, and the monitor units that treat the patient. Hand-calc them beside the TPS, never instead of a commissioned plan.
Linear accelerator · Open this machineHow to use it
Enter Sc and Sp (looked up from your machine tables). Read Sc,p. If you only have the measured in-phantom OF and an in-air Sc, then Sp = OF / Sc. Change one input and watch the curve and the simulation follow.
Symbols
- S_cCollimator scatter1.02
- S_pPhantom scatter1.01
Worked example
A typical case from the default values: S_c = 1.02 (Collimator scatter); S_p = 1.01 (Phantom scatter). Substituting into the relation gives S_{c,p} = 1.0302; S_p=OF/S_c = 1.01. These are teaching numbers — align them with your machine.
Typical values give
- S_{c,p} = 1.0302
- S_p=OF/S_c = 1.01
Where it comes from
The displayed formula is the working relation. Total output Sc,p = Sc(collimator) × Sp(phantom). Measured relative to 10×10. Usual reference: Khan Ch. 10 / AAPM TG-74. Derive it in the specialty lesson, then return here to pin the numbers.
Reference: Khan Ch. 10 / AAPM TG-74
Assumptions & limits
Normalized to 10×10 at the stated SSD/SAD. Equivalent-square interpolation is assumed. MLC leakage and tongue-and-groove are not in Sc/Sp. FFF beams have a different (often flatter) Sc,p vs size.
Pitfalls
Never mix PDD from one SSD with TMR from another without converting. Field size at the surface is not the size at isocentre. A hand MU is a check, not a treatment. Normalized to 10×10 at the stated SSD/SAD. Equivalent-square interpolation is assumed. MLC leakage and tongue-and-groove are not in Sc/Sp. FFF beams have a different (often flatter) Sc,p vs size.
Keep this
Name the SSD, energy, and field size with every PDD or TMR you quote. Normalized to 10×10 at the stated SSD/SAD. Equivalent-square interpolation is assumed. MLC leakage and tongue-and-groove are not in Sc/Sp. FFF beams have a different (often flatter) Sc,p vs size.
In this specialty