01 Therapy
Output factor S_c,p
Total scatter factor as collimator × phantom scatter.
Listen
Listen · English
Simulation
Output factor S_c,p — Change the numbers; the scene follows.
Where it works
Linear accelerator

Collimator / MLC
At the jaws / MLC: field size on the collimator sets equivalent square, penumbra, and Sc,p.
Open this machineFormula
Variables
Results
S_{c,p}
Output factor
1.0302
Ḋ
Output
1.0302cGy/MU
Explanation
What it means
The total scatter factor S_c,p factors into collimator scatter S_c (jaws, from in-air measurements) and phantom scatter S_p (from in-phantom). Output relative to 10×10 is S_c × S_p. Small fields have S_c,p well below 1. This is a working relation in Radiotherapy.
Where it is used
Clinically it sits on the Linear accelerator — Collimator / MLC. At the jaws / MLC: field size on the collimator sets equivalent square, penumbra, and Sc,p. Radiotherapy equations sit at the console and in the bunker: output, depth dose, equivalent square, and the monitor units that treat the patient. Hand-calc them beside the TPS, never instead of a commissioned plan.
Linear accelerator · Open this machineHow to use it
Look up S_c from the jaw setting (even if blocked) and S_p from the equivalent square at the phantom. Multiply by calibration output for cGy/MU at dmax. Change one input and watch the curve and the simulation follow.
Symbols
- S_cCollimator scatter1.02
- S_pPhantom scatter1.01
- Ḋ_calCalibration output 10×101 cGy/MU
Worked example
A typical case from the default values: S_c = 1.02 (Collimator scatter); S_p = 1.01 (Phantom scatter); Ḋ_cal = 1 cGy/MU (Calibration output 10×10). Substituting into the relation gives S_{c,p} = 1.0302; Ḋ = 1.0302 cGy/MU. These are teaching numbers — align them with your machine.
Typical values give
- S_{c,p} = 1.0302
- Ḋ = 1.0302cGy/MU
Where it comes from
The displayed formula is the working relation. Total scatter factor as collimator × phantom scatter. Usual reference: Khan. Derive it in the specialty lesson, then return here to pin the numbers.
Reference: Khan
Assumptions & limits
Does not include tray, wedge, or off-axis factors. Very small fields (< 3 cm) need a detector with small averaging volume — S_c,p is then detector-dependent.
Pitfalls
Never mix PDD from one SSD with TMR from another without converting. Field size at the surface is not the size at isocentre. A hand MU is a check, not a treatment. Does not include tray, wedge, or off-axis factors. Very small fields (< 3 cm) need a detector with small averaging volume — S_c,p is then detector-dependent.
Keep this
Name the SSD, energy, and field size with every PDD or TMR you quote. Does not include tray, wedge, or off-axis factors. Very small fields (< 3 cm) need a detector with small averaging volume — S_c,p is then detector-dependent.
In this specialty